RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Maven Trading vs Genk Capital

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

Maven Trading
MAVN
Maven Trading
EST. 2022
GENK
Genk Capital
EST. 2010
MAVEN TRADING
METRIC
GENK CAPITAL
68/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
$1,000,000
MAX FUNDING
$13
MIN COST
10d
PAYOUT DAYS
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

MAVEN TRADING DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto, ETFs
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader

GENK CAPITAL DETAILS

STEPS
-phase
MARKETS
Equities, Commodities, Digital Assets

Maven Trading PROS

  • +Max funding of $1,000,000 significantly exceeds the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • +Minimum challenge cost of $13 is far below the industry average of $186.7.
  • +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the challenge.
  • +On-demand payouts offer greater flexibility than fixed payout schedules.

Maven Trading CONS

  • EA/automated trading is not allowed, excluding a large segment of systematic traders.
  • Days to first payout at 10 days is above the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.

Genk Capital PROS

  • +Founded in 2010, giving Genk Capital over 14 years of operational history and implied institutional experience.
  • +Singapore-based firm operating in one of Asia's most reputable and well-regulated financial hubs.
  • +Covers Equities, Commodities, and Digital Assets, offering access to diverse and distinct asset classes.
  • +Long-established presence may suggest greater financial stability than newer prop firms.

Genk Capital CONS

  • No profit split, max funding, drawdown, or challenge cost data is available for industry comparison.
  • Absence of platform information makes it impossible to assess the trading environment.
  • Traders cannot evaluate value or risk parameters without core metrics such as drawdown or profit targets.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Maven Trading
Higher trust score (68/100). Faster payouts at 10d. 80% profit split.
Genk Capital
Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

Maven Trading Full Review →Genk Capital Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy