RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Maven Trading vs FundedElite
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
MAVN
Maven Trading
EST. 2022
FUNDE2
FundedElite
EST. 2023
MAVEN TRADING
METRIC
FUNDEDELITE
68/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—58/100
0/5—
RATING
BETTER3/5
80%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE80%
$1,000,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
—$300,000
$13BETTER
MIN COST
—$39
10d—
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER3d
—
PASS RATE
—
0—
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER1
MAVEN TRADING DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto, ETFs
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader
FUNDEDELITE DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Crypto, Metals, Indices, Commodities, Equities
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, TradeLocker, cTrader
Maven Trading PROS
- +Max funding of $1,000,000 significantly exceeds the industry average of $839,272.7.
- +Minimum challenge cost of $13 is far below the industry average of $186.7.
- +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the challenge.
- +On-demand payouts offer greater flexibility than fixed payout schedules.
Maven Trading CONS
- −EA/automated trading is not allowed, excluding a large segment of systematic traders.
- −Days to first payout at 10 days is above the industry average of 6.5 days.
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
FundedElite PROS
- +Minimum challenge cost of $39 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
- +Days to first payout of 3 is faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
- +Supports 6 asset classes including Forex, Crypto, Metals, Indices, Commodities, and Equities.
- +On-demand payouts, weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted.
FundedElite CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
- −Max funding of $300,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
- −Overall drawdown of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, offering marginally less buffer.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy