RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Maven Trading vs BuoyTrade
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
MAVN
Maven Trading
EST. 2022
BUOY
BuoyTrade
MAVEN TRADING
METRIC
BUOYTRADE
68/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE80%
$1,000,000—
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$1,024,000
$13BETTER
MIN COST
—$50
10dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
—14d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
MAVEN TRADING DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto, ETFs
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader
BUOYTRADE DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Static
- MARKETS
- Forex
- PLATFORMS
- MT4
Maven Trading PROS
- +Max funding of $1,000,000 significantly exceeds the industry average of $839,272.7.
- +Minimum challenge cost of $13 is far below the industry average of $186.7.
- +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the challenge.
- +On-demand payouts offer greater flexibility than fixed payout schedules.
Maven Trading CONS
- −EA/automated trading is not allowed, excluding a large segment of systematic traders.
- −Days to first payout at 10 days is above the industry average of 6.5 days.
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
BuoyTrade PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $50 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly affordable.
- +Single-step funding is better than the industry average of 1.6 steps, offering a faster path to funded status.
- +Max funding of $1,024,000 is above the industry average of $839,272.7, providing above-average scaling potential.
- +Profit target of 5% is well below the industry average of 7.9%, making the evaluation stage easier to pass.
BuoyTrade CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, reducing the trader's share of earnings.
- −Overall drawdown of 5% is well below the industry average of 7.9%, offering significantly less margin before breach.
- −EA/automated trading is not allowed, restricting algorithmic traders from participating with this firm.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy