RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Maven Trading vs Blue Guardian

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

Maven Trading
MAVN
Maven Trading
EST. 2022
BLGD
Blue Guardian
MAVEN TRADING
METRIC
BLUE GUARDIAN
68/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—55/100
0/5—
RATING
BETTER3/5
80%—
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER90%
$1,000,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
—$400,000
$13
MIN COST
—
10d—
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER7d
—
PASS RATE
—
0—
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER1

MAVEN TRADING DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto, ETFs
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader

BLUE GUARDIAN DETAILS

STEPS
3-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Forex, Futures
PLATFORMS
MT5, Matchtrader, Tradelocker, Tradovate, ProjectX, Volsys, Deepcharts

Maven Trading PROS

  • +Max funding of $1,000,000 significantly exceeds the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • +Minimum challenge cost of $13 is far below the industry average of $186.7.
  • +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the challenge.
  • +On-demand payouts offer greater flexibility than fixed payout schedules.

Maven Trading CONS

  • −EA/automated trading is not allowed, excluding a large segment of systematic traders.
  • −Days to first payout at 10 days is above the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.

Blue Guardian PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, favouring the trader
  • +On-demand payout frequency offers maximum withdrawal flexibility
  • +Max funding of $400,000 provides substantial capital access for traders
  • +Offers both Forex and Futures markets, giving traders access to multiple asset classes

Blue Guardian CONS

  • −Three steps to funded is above the industry average of 1.6, requiring more evaluation stages
  • −Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, providing less loss tolerance
  • −No min challenge cost or profit target data is provided for full comparison

PROPDNA VERDICT

Maven Trading
Higher trust score (68/100). Slower payouts at 10d. 80% profit split.
Blue Guardian
Lower trust score (55/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Maven Trading Full Review →Blue Guardian Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy