RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Lux Trading Firm vs Savius

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

LUXT

Lux Trading Firm

EST. 2019

SVUS

Savius

EST. 2013

LUX TRADING FIRM

METRIC

SAVIUS

76/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

75%—

PROFIT SPLIT

BETTER90%

$10,000,000BETTER

MAX FUNDING

—$300,000

$100BETTER

MIN COST

—$285

7d—

PAYOUT DAYS

BETTER3d

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

LUX TRADING FIRM DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS: MT4, MT5, cTrader
TYPES: forex, advanced, large-cap

SAVIUS DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Futures, Indices
PLATFORMS: ATAS, Quantower

Lux Trading Firm PROS

+Max funding of $10,000,000 vastly exceeds the industry average of $839,272.7, offering elite scaling potential.
+Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, providing a faster path to capital.
+Min challenge cost of $100 is below the industry average of $186.7, keeping entry costs reasonable.
+Fixed drawdown type gives traders clear and stable risk parameters to plan around.

Lux Trading Firm CONS

−Profit split of 75% is notably below the industry average of 84.7%, significantly reducing trader earnings.
−Payout frequency is monthly, which is slower than most firms offering weekly or bi-weekly payouts.
−News trading is not allowed and fee refund is unavailable, reducing trader flexibility and cost recovery options.

Savius PROS

+Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7% by 5.3 percentage points
+Days to first payout is 3, significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
+Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, simplifying the path to capital
+Founded in 2013, making it one of the more established prop firms with over a decade of operation

Savius CONS

−Max funding of $300,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272, limiting earning potential
−Min challenge cost of $285 is significantly higher than the industry average of $186.70
−Overall drawdown of 4% is considerably tighter than the industry average of 7.9%, increasing risk of disqualification

PROPDNA VERDICT

Lux Trading Firm

Higher trust score (76/100). Slower payouts at 7d. 75% profit split.

START WITH LUXT