RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Lux Trading Firm vs Lark Funding

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

LUXT

Lux Trading Firm

EST. 2019

LRKF

Lark Funding

EST. 2022

LUX TRADING FIRM

METRIC

LARK FUNDING

76/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

75%—

PROFIT SPLIT

BETTER80%

$10,000,000BETTER

MAX FUNDING

—$200,000

$100BETTER

MIN COST

—$200

7d—

PAYOUT DAYS

BETTER1d

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

LUX TRADING FIRM DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS: MT4, MT5, cTrader
TYPES: forex, advanced, large-cap

LARK FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex

Lux Trading Firm PROS

+Max funding of $10,000,000 vastly exceeds the industry average of $839,272.7, offering elite scaling potential.
+Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, providing a faster path to capital.
+Min challenge cost of $100 is below the industry average of $186.7, keeping entry costs reasonable.
+Fixed drawdown type gives traders clear and stable risk parameters to plan around.

Lux Trading Firm CONS

−Profit split of 75% is notably below the industry average of 84.7%, significantly reducing trader earnings.
−Payout frequency is monthly, which is slower than most firms offering weekly or bi-weekly payouts.
−News trading is not allowed and fee refund is unavailable, reducing trader flexibility and cost recovery options.

Lark Funding PROS

+Days to first payout of 1 is exceptionally faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps.
+News trading is permitted, giving traders additional strategic flexibility.
+Minimum challenge cost of $200 is close to the industry average of $186.7, offering a recognizable entry point.

Lark Funding CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
−Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
−Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making the evaluation harder to pass.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Lux Trading Firm

Higher trust score (76/100). Slower payouts at 7d. 75% profit split.

START WITH LUXT