RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Lux Trading Firm vs Lucid Trading

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

Lux Trading Firm
LUXT
Lux Trading Firm
EST. 2019
LCDT
Lucid Trading
LUX TRADING FIRM
METRIC
LUCID TRADING
76/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
75%—
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER90%
$10,000,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$100—
MIN COST
BETTER$90
7d—
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER1d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

LUX TRADING FIRM DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5, cTrader
TYPES
forex, advanced, large-cap

LUCID TRADING DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic, MotiveWave, QuantTower

Lux Trading Firm PROS

  • +Max funding of $10,000,000 vastly exceeds the industry average of $839,272.7, offering elite scaling potential.
  • +Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, providing a faster path to capital.
  • +Min challenge cost of $100 is below the industry average of $186.7, keeping entry costs reasonable.
  • +Fixed drawdown type gives traders clear and stable risk parameters to plan around.

Lux Trading Firm CONS

  • −Profit split of 75% is notably below the industry average of 84.7%, significantly reducing trader earnings.
  • −Payout frequency is monthly, which is slower than most firms offering weekly or bi-weekly payouts.
  • −News trading is not allowed and fee refund is unavailable, reducing trader flexibility and cost recovery options.

Lucid Trading PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% is above the industry average of 84.7%
  • +Days to first payout of 1 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +On-demand payouts offer maximum flexibility in accessing earned profits
  • +Wide platform selection including NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic, MotiveWave, and QuantTower

Lucid Trading CONS

  • −No max funding data provided, preventing comparison to the industry average of $839,272.70
  • −Profit target of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, marginally harder to achieve
  • −Trailing EOD drawdown type can be more restrictive than fixed drawdown structures

PROPDNA VERDICT

Lux Trading Firm
Higher trust score (76/100). Slower payouts at 7d. 75% profit split.
Lucid Trading
Lower trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Lux Trading Firm Full Review →Lucid Trading Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy