RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Lux Trading Firm vs E8 Funding

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

LUXT

Lux Trading Firm

EST. 2019

E8FD

E8 Funding

EST. 2021

LUX TRADING FIRM

METRIC

E8 FUNDING

76/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

75%—

PROFIT SPLIT

BETTER80%

$10,000,000BETTER

MAX FUNDING

—$400,000

$100—

MIN COST

BETTER$25

7d—

PAYOUT DAYS

BETTER3d

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

LUX TRADING FIRM DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS: MT4, MT5, cTrader
TYPES: forex, advanced, large-cap

E8 FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
MARKETS: Forex, Futures, Crypto

Lux Trading Firm PROS

+Max funding of $10,000,000 vastly exceeds the industry average of $839,272.7, offering elite scaling potential.
+Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, providing a faster path to capital.
+Min challenge cost of $100 is below the industry average of $186.7, keeping entry costs reasonable.
+Fixed drawdown type gives traders clear and stable risk parameters to plan around.

Lux Trading Firm CONS

−Profit split of 75% is notably below the industry average of 84.7%, significantly reducing trader earnings.
−Payout frequency is monthly, which is slower than most firms offering weekly or bi-weekly payouts.
−News trading is not allowed and fee refund is unavailable, reducing trader flexibility and cost recovery options.

E8 Funding PROS

+Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded.
+Minimum challenge cost of $25 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
+Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the challenge.
+On-demand payouts offer more flexibility than fixed or bi-weekly schedules.

E8 Funding CONS

−Overall drawdown of 3% is significantly below the industry average of 7.9%, leaving very little room for loss.
−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
−Max funding of $400,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Lux Trading Firm

Higher trust score (76/100). Slower payouts at 7d. 75% profit split.

START WITH LUXT