RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Lux Trading Firm vs Blue Guardian Futures

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

Lux Trading Firm
LUXT
Lux Trading Firm
EST. 2019
BGFT
Blue Guardian Futures
LUX TRADING FIRM
METRIC
BLUE GUARDIAN FUTURES
76/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
75%
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER100%
$10,000,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
$450,000
$100
MIN COST
BETTER$84
7d
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER5d
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

LUX TRADING FIRM DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5, cTrader
TYPES
forex, advanced, large-cap

BLUE GUARDIAN FUTURES DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
MT5, Matchtrader, Tradelocker, Tradovate, ProjectX, Volsys, Deepcharts

Lux Trading Firm PROS

  • +Max funding of $10,000,000 vastly exceeds the industry average of $839,272.7, offering elite scaling potential.
  • +Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, providing a faster path to capital.
  • +Min challenge cost of $100 is below the industry average of $186.7, keeping entry costs reasonable.
  • +Fixed drawdown type gives traders clear and stable risk parameters to plan around.

Lux Trading Firm CONS

  • Profit split of 75% is notably below the industry average of 84.7%, significantly reducing trader earnings.
  • Payout frequency is monthly, which is slower than most firms offering weekly or bi-weekly payouts.
  • News trading is not allowed and fee refund is unavailable, reducing trader flexibility and cost recovery options.

Blue Guardian Futures PROS

  • +Profit split of 100% is the maximum possible, far exceeding the industry average of 84.7%
  • +Min challenge cost of $84 is well below the industry average of $186.70, reducing entry costs
  • +Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, offering a streamlined path to capital
  • +Days to first payout is 5, slightly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days

Blue Guardian Futures CONS

  • Overall drawdown of 3.5% is expressed as a percentage but is exceptionally tight, increasing disqualification risk
  • Max funding of $450,000 is below the industry average of $839,272, limiting maximum earning potential
  • Futures-only market access restricts traders who prefer Forex, Indices, or other asset classes

PROPDNA VERDICT

Lux Trading Firm
Higher trust score (76/100). Slower payouts at 7d. 75% profit split.
Blue Guardian Futures
Lower trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 5d. 100% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Lux Trading Firm Full Review →Blue Guardian Futures Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy