RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Lux Trading Firm vs Blueberry Futures

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

Lux Trading Firm
LUXT
Lux Trading Firm
EST. 2019
Blueberry Futures
BBFU
Blueberry Futures
EST. 2025
LUX TRADING FIRM
METRIC
BLUEBERRY FUTURES
76/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—62/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
75%—
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER90%
$10,000,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
—$150,000
$100BETTER
MIN COST
—$184
7dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
—14d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

LUX TRADING FIRM DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5, cTrader
TYPES
forex, advanced, large-cap

BLUEBERRY FUTURES DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
Blackarrow
TYPES
futures

Lux Trading Firm PROS

  • +Max funding of $10,000,000 vastly exceeds the industry average of $839,272.7, offering elite scaling potential.
  • +Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, providing a faster path to capital.
  • +Min challenge cost of $100 is below the industry average of $186.7, keeping entry costs reasonable.
  • +Fixed drawdown type gives traders clear and stable risk parameters to plan around.

Lux Trading Firm CONS

  • −Profit split of 75% is notably below the industry average of 84.7%, significantly reducing trader earnings.
  • −Payout frequency is monthly, which is slower than most firms offering weekly or bi-weekly payouts.
  • −News trading is not allowed and fee refund is unavailable, reducing trader flexibility and cost recovery options.

Blueberry Futures PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%
  • +Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps
  • +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation easier to pass
  • +Min challenge cost of $184 is just below the industry average of $186.7

Blueberry Futures CONS

  • −EA/automated trading is not allowed, significantly restricting algorithmic traders
  • −News trading is not allowed, restricting strategy options during high-impact events
  • −Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days

PROPDNA VERDICT

Lux Trading Firm
Higher trust score (76/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 75% profit split.
Blueberry Futures
Lower trust score (62/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Lux Trading Firm Full Review →Blueberry Futures Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy