RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Lux Trading Firm vs ATFunded
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
LUXT
Lux Trading Firm
EST. 2019
ATFD
ATFunded
LUX TRADING FIRM
METRIC
ATFUNDED
76/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
75%—
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER80%
$10,000,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
—$200,000
$100—
MIN COST
BETTER$49
7dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
—14d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
LUX TRADING FIRM DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
- PLATFORMS
- MT4, MT5, cTrader
- TYPES
- forex, advanced, large-cap
ATFUNDED DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing EOD
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto
Lux Trading Firm PROS
- +Max funding of $10,000,000 vastly exceeds the industry average of $839,272.7, offering elite scaling potential.
- +Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, providing a faster path to capital.
- +Min challenge cost of $100 is below the industry average of $186.7, keeping entry costs reasonable.
- +Fixed drawdown type gives traders clear and stable risk parameters to plan around.
Lux Trading Firm CONS
- −Profit split of 75% is notably below the industry average of 84.7%, significantly reducing trader earnings.
- −Payout frequency is monthly, which is slower than most firms offering weekly or bi-weekly payouts.
- −News trading is not allowed and fee refund is unavailable, reducing trader flexibility and cost recovery options.
ATFunded PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry very affordable.
- +EA/automated trading is permitted, supporting algorithmic and systematic trading strategies.
- +Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, offering more buffer before a breach occurs.
- +Multi-market access including Forex, Indices, Commodities, and Crypto provides good diversification options.
ATFunded CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, meaning traders retain less of their profits.
- −Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
- −Days to first payout at 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, significantly slowing cash flow.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy