RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Lark Funding vs Savius
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
LRKF
Lark Funding
EST. 2022
SVUS
Savius
EST. 2013
LARK FUNDING
METRIC
SAVIUS
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%—
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER90%
$200,000—
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$300,000
$200BETTER
MIN COST
—$285
1dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
—3d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
LARK FUNDING DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex
SAVIUS DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Futures, Indices
- PLATFORMS
- ATAS, Quantower
Lark Funding PROS
- +Days to first payout of 1 is exceptionally faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
- +Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps.
- +News trading is permitted, giving traders additional strategic flexibility.
- +Minimum challenge cost of $200 is close to the industry average of $186.7, offering a recognizable entry point.
Lark Funding CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
- −Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
- −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making the evaluation harder to pass.
Savius PROS
- +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7% by 5.3 percentage points
- +Days to first payout is 3, significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
- +Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, simplifying the path to capital
- +Founded in 2013, making it one of the more established prop firms with over a decade of operation
Savius CONS
- −Max funding of $300,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272, limiting earning potential
- −Min challenge cost of $285 is significantly higher than the industry average of $186.70
- −Overall drawdown of 4% is considerably tighter than the industry average of 7.9%, increasing risk of disqualification
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy