RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Lark Funding vs FTUK
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
LRKF
Lark Funding
EST. 2022
FTUK
FTUK
EST. 2020
LARK FUNDING
METRIC
FTUK
0/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER60/100
0/5—
RATING
BETTER5/5
80%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE80%
$200,000—
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$400,000
$200—
MIN COST
BETTER$119
1dTIE
PAYOUT DAYS
TIE1d
—
PASS RATE
20%
0—
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER1
LARK FUNDING DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex
FTUK DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
- PLATFORMS
- MT4, MT5
- TYPES
- forex, fast-payout, large-cap
Lark Funding PROS
- +Days to first payout of 1 is exceptionally faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
- +Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps.
- +News trading is permitted, giving traders additional strategic flexibility.
- +Minimum challenge cost of $200 is close to the industry average of $186.7, offering a recognizable entry point.
Lark Funding CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
- −Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
- −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making the evaluation harder to pass.
FTUK PROS
- +Days to first payout is 1, dramatically faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
- +Min challenge cost of $119 is below the industry average of $186.70, reducing entry costs
- +Fee refund is offered, adding financial protection for traders who pass the challenge
- +Allows weekend holding, news trading, and EA/automated trading, offering maximum strategy flexibility
FTUK CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7% by 4.7 percentage points
- −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to pass
- −Pass rate of 20% is low, indicating most traders do not successfully complete the evaluation
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy