RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Lark Funding vs FundedFast

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

LRKF
Lark Funding
EST. 2022
FNDF
FundedFast
LARK FUNDING
METRIC
FUNDEDFAST
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE80%
$200,000
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$400,000
$200
MIN COST
BETTER$49
1dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
7d
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

LARK FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex

FUNDEDFAST DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex

Lark Funding PROS

  • +Days to first payout of 1 is exceptionally faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps.
  • +News trading is permitted, giving traders additional strategic flexibility.
  • +Minimum challenge cost of $200 is close to the industry average of $186.7, offering a recognizable entry point.

Lark Funding CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
  • Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making the evaluation harder to pass.

FundedFast PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $49 is extremely low compared to the industry average of $186.7
  • +Fee refund offered, reducing the net cost of the evaluation process
  • +Weekend holding is allowed, providing greater trading flexibility
  • +Weekly payout frequency offers faster access to profits than many firms

FundedFast CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
  • Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating less buffer
  • Profit target of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, marginally harder to achieve

PROPDNA VERDICT

Lark Funding
Higher trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.
FundedFast
Higher trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at 7d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Lark Funding Full Review →FundedFast Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy