RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Lark Funding vs Blueberry Futures

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

LRKF
Lark Funding
EST. 2022
Blueberry Futures
BBFU
Blueberry Futures
EST. 2025
LARK FUNDING
METRIC
BLUEBERRY FUTURES
0/100
TRUST SCORE
BETTER62/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER90%
$200,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
$150,000
$200
MIN COST
BETTER$184
1dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
14d
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

LARK FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex

BLUEBERRY FUTURES DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
Blackarrow
TYPES
futures

Lark Funding PROS

  • +Days to first payout of 1 is exceptionally faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps.
  • +News trading is permitted, giving traders additional strategic flexibility.
  • +Minimum challenge cost of $200 is close to the industry average of $186.7, offering a recognizable entry point.

Lark Funding CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
  • Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making the evaluation harder to pass.

Blueberry Futures PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%
  • +Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps
  • +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation easier to pass
  • +Min challenge cost of $184 is just below the industry average of $186.7

Blueberry Futures CONS

  • EA/automated trading is not allowed, significantly restricting algorithmic traders
  • News trading is not allowed, restricting strategy options during high-impact events
  • Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days

PROPDNA VERDICT

Lark Funding
Lower trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.
Blueberry Futures
Higher trust score (62/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Lark Funding Full Review →Blueberry Futures Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy