RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Lark Funding vs Apex Trader Funding

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

LRKF

Lark Funding

EST. 2022

APEX

Apex Trader Funding

✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2021

LARK FUNDING

METRIC

APEX TRADER FUNDING

0/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER61/100

0/5—

RATING

BETTER4/5

80%—

PROFIT SPLIT

BETTER90%

$200,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$300,000

$200—

MIN COST

BETTER$35

1dBETTER

PAYOUT DAYS

—8d

—

PASS RATE

31%

0—

REVIEW COUNT

BETTER1

LARK FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex

APEX TRADER FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing EOD
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: MT4, MT5
TYPES: futures, large-cap

Lark Funding PROS

+Days to first payout of 1 is exceptionally faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps.
+News trading is permitted, giving traders additional strategic flexibility.
+Minimum challenge cost of $200 is close to the industry average of $186.7, offering a recognizable entry point.

Lark Funding CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
−Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
−Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making the evaluation harder to pass.

Apex Trader Funding PROS

+Min challenge cost of $35 is among the lowest and far below the industry average of $186.7
+Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%
+Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
+Single-step funding is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps

Apex Trader Funding CONS

−Futures firm uses a dollar-based drawdown structure; overall drawdown percentage is not directly comparable to the 7.9% CFD average
−Days to first payout of 8 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5 days
−Trailing EOD drawdown type is more restrictive than a fixed drawdown structure

PROPDNA VERDICT

Lark Funding

Lower trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.

START WITH LRKF