RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
LiquidityX vs The Trading Pit
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
LQDX
LiquidityX
EST. 2026
TTP
The Trading Pit
EST. 2022
LIQUIDITYX
METRIC
THE TRADING PIT
0/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER74/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
—
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
—
MAX FUNDING
$5,000,000
—
MIN COST
$99
—
PAYOUT DAYS
1d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
LIQUIDITYX DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
THE TRADING PIT DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing EOD
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto, Stocks, Futures
- PLATFORMS
- MT4, MT5, NinjaTrader, Rithmic, cTrader
LiquidityX PROS
- +Placeholder pro — no data provided beyond founding year; no metrics to evaluate
- +Placeholder pro — no data provided beyond founding year; no metrics to evaluate
- +Placeholder pro — no data provided beyond founding year; no metrics to evaluate
- +Placeholder pro — no data provided beyond founding year; no metrics to evaluate
LiquidityX CONS
- −Founded in 2026, meaning this firm does not yet exist at time of writing
- −A future founding date raises serious concerns about legitimacy and operational status
- −No trading metrics are available to compare against any industry averages
The Trading Pit PROS
- +Max funding of $5,000,000 is far above the industry average of $839,272.7
- +Days to first payout of 1 is far below the industry average of 6.5 days
- +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
- +Broadest market access listed, covering Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto, Stocks, and Futures
The Trading Pit CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
- −Trailing EOD drawdown type is more restrictive than a fixed drawdown structure
- −Two steps to funded is slightly above the industry average of 1.6 steps
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy