RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Liquid Capital Group vs PipFarm

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

LQCG
Liquid Capital Group
PipFarm
PFAR
PipFarm
EST. 2023
LIQUID CAPITAL GROUP
METRIC
PIPFARM
0/100
TRUST SCORE
BETTER72/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
PROFIT SPLIT
85%
MAX FUNDING
$200,000
MIN COST
$45
PAYOUT DAYS
7d
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

LIQUID CAPITAL GROUP DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

PIPFARM DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
forex, fast-payout

Liquid Capital Group PROS

  • +No data is available on profit split, funding, or cost metrics for this firm
  • +No data is available on drawdown or profit target for this firm
  • +No data is available on payout timing or steps to funded for this firm
  • +No data is available on platforms, markets, or founding date for this firm

Liquid Capital Group CONS

  • Virtually no data is provided, making any objective evaluation impossible
  • Traders cannot compare this firm's terms to the industry average of 84.7% profit split
  • Lack of transparency on key metrics is a significant risk for traders making financial decisions

PipFarm PROS

  • +Minimum challenge cost of $45 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
  • +Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded.
  • +Profit split of 85% slightly exceeds the industry average of 84.7%.
  • +News trading, EA/automated trading, and weekend holding are all permitted.

PipFarm CONS

  • Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • Days to first payout at 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5.
  • Founded in 2023, offering a limited operational track record for traders to assess.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Liquid Capital Group
Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.
PipFarm
Higher trust score (72/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 85% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Liquid Capital Group Full Review →PipFarm Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy