RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Liquid Capital Group vs Goat Funded Futures

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

LQCG

Liquid Capital Group

GFFU

Goat Funded Futures

LIQUID CAPITAL GROUP

METRIC

GOAT FUNDED FUTURES

47/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—45/100

3.12/5—

RATING

BETTER4/5

—

PROFIT SPLIT

—

MAX FUNDING

—

MIN COST

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

4BETTER

REVIEW COUNT

—2

LIQUID CAPITAL GROUP DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

GOAT FUNDED FUTURES DETAILS

STEPS: -phase
MARKETS: Futures

Liquid Capital Group PROS

+No data is available on profit split, funding, or cost metrics for this firm
+No data is available on drawdown or profit target for this firm
+No data is available on payout timing or steps to funded for this firm
+No data is available on platforms, markets, or founding date for this firm

Liquid Capital Group CONS

−Virtually no data is provided, making any objective evaluation impossible
−Traders cannot compare this firm's terms to the industry average of 84.7% profit split
−Lack of transparency on key metrics is a significant risk for traders making financial decisions

Goat Funded Futures PROS

+Listed as a futures firm, providing access to an asset class not offered by all prop firms.
+Hong Kong base may offer access to Asian market hours and related futures instruments.
+Futures markets offer high liquidity and defined contract structures attractive to professional traders.
+Specialisation in futures suggests a focused and potentially expert evaluation framework.

Goat Funded Futures CONS

−No trading data has been provided for this firm, making objective comparison impossible.
−Without profit split, drawdown, funding levels, or challenge cost, no industry benchmarks can be applied.
−Traders cannot assess suitability or value without disclosure of core terms and conditions.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Liquid Capital Group

Higher trust score (47/100). Faster payouts at —d.

START WITH LQCG