RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Limitless Funding vs ZoraFX
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
LMTF
Limitless Funding
ZRFX
ZoraFX
LIMITLESS FUNDING
METRIC
ZORAFX
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
—
PROFIT SPLIT
90%
—
MAX FUNDING
$200,000
—
MIN COST
$59
—
PAYOUT DAYS
10d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
LIMITLESS FUNDING DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
ZORAFX DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex
- PLATFORMS
- MT5
Limitless Funding PROS
- +No data is available to identify any above-average metrics for Limitless Funding.
- +No data is available to identify any above-average metrics for Limitless Funding.
- +No data is available to identify any above-average metrics for Limitless Funding.
- +No data is available to identify any above-average metrics for Limitless Funding.
Limitless Funding CONS
- −Almost no firm data is provided, making meaningful comparison to industry averages impossible.
- −Without cost, payout, or funding data, traders cannot assess value against the $186.7 average challenge cost.
- −Lack of transparency on key metrics is a significant concern for traders making real financial decisions.
ZoraFX PROS
- +Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a significantly higher earnings share.
- +Min challenge cost of $59 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry very affordable.
- +Fee refund is offered, reducing the effective cost of the challenge upon successful completion.
- +Weekend holding and news trading are both permitted, providing strong flexibility for trading strategies.
ZoraFX CONS
- −Overall drawdown of 5% is below the industry average of 7.9%, providing less margin for drawdown before breach.
- −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to pass.
- −Days to first payout at 10 is above the industry average of 6.5, meaning a longer wait for initial earnings.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy