Lionheart Funding vs Topstep

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

LIONHEART FUNDING DETAILS

+No data is available to identify any above-average metrics for Lionheart Funding.
+No data is available to identify any above-average metrics for Lionheart Funding.
+No data is available to identify any above-average metrics for Lionheart Funding.
+No data is available to identify any above-average metrics for Lionheart Funding.

−Almost no firm data is provided, making meaningful comparison to industry averages impossible.
−Without cost, payout, or funding data, traders cannot assess value against the $186.7 average challenge cost.
−Lack of transparency on key metrics is a significant concern for traders making real financial decisions.

+Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%, offering traders a superior earnings share.
+Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly accessible.
+Single-step funding is better than the industry average of 1.6 steps, streamlining the path to funded status.
+Founded in 2012, Topstep is one of the most established prop firms, providing strong credibility and track record.

−Max funding of $150,000 is far below the industry average of $839,272.7, significantly limiting earning potential.
−Overall drawdown of 10% with trailing EOD type means drawdown limits tighten as profits grow, increasing risk.
−Days to first payout at 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5, a minor but notable delay.

Lionheart Funding

Lower trust score (41/100). Slower payouts at —d.

Topstep

Higher trust score (69/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 90% profit split.