RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Lionheart Funding vs FTUK

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

LHFT
Lionheart Funding
FTUK
FTUK
FTUK
EST. 2020
LIONHEART FUNDING
METRIC
FTUK
0/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER60/100
0/5—
RATING
BETTER5/5
—
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
—
MAX FUNDING
$400,000
—
MIN COST
$119
—
PAYOUT DAYS
1d
—
PASS RATE
20%
0—
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER1

LIONHEART FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

FTUK DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
forex, fast-payout, large-cap

Lionheart Funding PROS

  • +No data is available to identify any above-average metrics for Lionheart Funding.
  • +No data is available to identify any above-average metrics for Lionheart Funding.
  • +No data is available to identify any above-average metrics for Lionheart Funding.
  • +No data is available to identify any above-average metrics for Lionheart Funding.

Lionheart Funding CONS

  • −Almost no firm data is provided, making meaningful comparison to industry averages impossible.
  • −Without cost, payout, or funding data, traders cannot assess value against the $186.7 average challenge cost.
  • −Lack of transparency on key metrics is a significant concern for traders making real financial decisions.

FTUK PROS

  • +Days to first payout is 1, dramatically faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +Min challenge cost of $119 is below the industry average of $186.70, reducing entry costs
  • +Fee refund is offered, adding financial protection for traders who pass the challenge
  • +Allows weekend holding, news trading, and EA/automated trading, offering maximum strategy flexibility

FTUK CONS

  • −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7% by 4.7 percentage points
  • −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to pass
  • −Pass rate of 20% is low, indicating most traders do not successfully complete the evaluation

PROPDNA VERDICT

Lionheart Funding
Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.
FTUK
Higher trust score (60/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Lionheart Funding Full Review →FTUK Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy