Lionheart Funding vs Aqua Funded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

LIONHEART FUNDING DETAILS

+No data is available to identify any above-average metrics for Lionheart Funding.
+No data is available to identify any above-average metrics for Lionheart Funding.
+No data is available to identify any above-average metrics for Lionheart Funding.
+No data is available to identify any above-average metrics for Lionheart Funding.

−Almost no firm data is provided, making meaningful comparison to industry averages impossible.
−Without cost, payout, or funding data, traders cannot assess value against the $186.7 average challenge cost.
−Lack of transparency on key metrics is a significant concern for traders making real financial decisions.

+Min challenge cost of just $1 is exceptionally below the industry average of $186.7, making it highly accessible.
+Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
+Profit split of 90% significantly exceeds the industry average of 84.7%.
+Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering maximum trading flexibility.

−Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to manage larger potential losses.
−Profit target of 10% is higher than the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to pass.
−Days to first payout of 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5 days.

Lionheart Funding

Lower trust score (41/100). Slower payouts at —d.

Aqua Funded

Higher trust score (59/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 90% profit split.