RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Lionheart Funding Program vs Ment Funding

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

LHFP

Lionheart Funding Program

MNTF

Ment Funding

LIONHEART FUNDING PROGRAM

METRIC

MENT FUNDING

48/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER51/100

4/5—

RATING

BETTER5/5

—

PROFIT SPLIT

—

MAX FUNDING

—

MIN COST

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

3—

REVIEW COUNT

BETTER4

LIONHEART FUNDING PROGRAM DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

MENT FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

Lionheart Funding Program PROS

+Listed on PropDNA, establishing a baseline presence for trader research
+No confirmed negative metrics due to absence of data
+Firm name suggests a defined brand identity in the prop space
+No restrictive conditions are confirmed from available data

Lionheart Funding Program CONS

−No data provided on profit split, max funding, or challenge cost
−No trading conditions such as drawdown, profit target, or payout terms are available
−Traders cannot make an informed comparison without any measurable metrics

Ment Funding PROS

+Listed on PropDNA, giving traders a reference point for discovery
+No restrictive data points provided that could indicate unfavorable terms
+Absence of negative metrics means no confirmed below-average figures
+Firm identity is established enough to be catalogued for comparison

Ment Funding CONS

−No data provided on profit split, max funding, or challenge cost
−No trading conditions such as drawdown, profit target, or payout terms are available
−Traders cannot make an informed decision without any comparable metrics

PROPDNA VERDICT

Lionheart Funding Program

Lower trust score (48/100). Faster payouts at —d.

START WITH LHFP