RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Lionheart Funding Program vs OneFunded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

LHFP

Lionheart Funding Program

1FND

OneFunded

✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2023

LIONHEART FUNDING PROGRAM

METRIC

ONEFUNDED

48/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER60/100

4/5BETTER

RATING

—3.5/5

—

PROFIT SPLIT

90%

—

MAX FUNDING

$200,000

—

MIN COST

$59

—

PAYOUT DAYS

14d

—

PASS RATE

35%

3BETTER

REVIEW COUNT

—2

LIONHEART FUNDING PROGRAM DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

ONEFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Crypto, Metals, Stocks
PLATFORMS: MT5, cTrader
TYPES: forex, beginner, multi-asset, crypto

Lionheart Funding Program PROS

+Listed on PropDNA, establishing a baseline presence for trader research
+No confirmed negative metrics due to absence of data
+Firm name suggests a defined brand identity in the prop space
+No restrictive conditions are confirmed from available data

Lionheart Funding Program CONS

−No data provided on profit split, max funding, or challenge cost
−No trading conditions such as drawdown, profit target, or payout terms are available
−Traders cannot make an informed comparison without any measurable metrics

OneFunded PROS

+No time limits on eval
+4 challenge tracks
+Transparent rules

OneFunded CONS

−Days to first payout is 14, more than double the industry average of 6.5 days
−Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272
−Pass rate of 35% suggests moderate selectivity, though no drawdown or profit target data is provided for context

PROPDNA VERDICT

Lionheart Funding Program

Lower trust score (48/100). Slower payouts at —d.

START WITH LHFP