Legends Trading vs Topstep

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

LEGENDS TRADING DETAILS

+No additional data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Legends Trading.
+No additional data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Legends Trading.
+No additional data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Legends Trading.
+No additional data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Legends Trading.

−Min challenge cost of $499 is significantly above the industry average of $186.7, increasing entry cost.
−Almost no other firm data is provided, making broader comparison to industry averages impossible.
−Without profit split, funding, or payout data, traders cannot fully evaluate this firm's overall value.

+Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%, offering traders a superior earnings share.
+Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly accessible.
+Single-step funding is better than the industry average of 1.6 steps, streamlining the path to funded status.
+Founded in 2012, Topstep is one of the most established prop firms, providing strong credibility and track record.

−Max funding of $150,000 is far below the industry average of $839,272.7, significantly limiting earning potential.
−Overall drawdown of 10% with trailing EOD type means drawdown limits tighten as profits grow, increasing risk.
−Days to first payout at 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5, a minor but notable delay.

Legends Trading

Lower trust score (46/100). Slower payouts at —d.

Topstep

Higher trust score (69/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 90% profit split.