RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Legends Trading vs OneUp Trader
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
LGDT
Legends Trading
OUPT
OneUp Trader
EST. 2017
LEGENDS TRADING
METRIC
ONEUP TRADER
0/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER51/100
0/5—
RATING
BETTER4/5
—
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
—
MAX FUNDING
$250,000
$499—
MIN COST
BETTER$125
—
PAYOUT DAYS
14d
—
PASS RATE
—
0—
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER1
LEGENDS TRADING DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
ONEUP TRADER DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- NinjaTrader, Sierra Chart, Rithmic
- TYPES
- futures, large-cap
Legends Trading PROS
- +No additional data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Legends Trading.
- +No additional data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Legends Trading.
- +No additional data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Legends Trading.
- +No additional data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Legends Trading.
Legends Trading CONS
- −Min challenge cost of $499 is significantly above the industry average of $186.7, increasing entry cost.
- −Almost no other firm data is provided, making broader comparison to industry averages impossible.
- −Without profit split, funding, or payout data, traders cannot fully evaluate this firm's overall value.
OneUp Trader PROS
- +Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps.
- +Minimum challenge cost of $125 is below the industry average of $186.7.
- +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation easier to pass.
- +Founded in 2017, making it one of the more established prop firms in the industry.
OneUp Trader CONS
- −Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days.
- −Max funding of $250,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7.
- −Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting trader flexibility over weekends.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy