RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Legends Trading vs FundedElite
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
LGDT
Legends Trading
FUNDE2
FundedElite
EST. 2023
LEGENDS TRADING
METRIC
FUNDEDELITE
0/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER58/100
0/5—
RATING
BETTER3/5
—
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
—
MAX FUNDING
$300,000
$499—
MIN COST
BETTER$39
—
PAYOUT DAYS
3d
—
PASS RATE
—
0—
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER1
LEGENDS TRADING DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
FUNDEDELITE DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Crypto, Metals, Indices, Commodities, Equities
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, TradeLocker, cTrader
Legends Trading PROS
- +No additional data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Legends Trading.
- +No additional data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Legends Trading.
- +No additional data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Legends Trading.
- +No additional data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Legends Trading.
Legends Trading CONS
- −Min challenge cost of $499 is significantly above the industry average of $186.7, increasing entry cost.
- −Almost no other firm data is provided, making broader comparison to industry averages impossible.
- −Without profit split, funding, or payout data, traders cannot fully evaluate this firm's overall value.
FundedElite PROS
- +Minimum challenge cost of $39 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
- +Days to first payout of 3 is faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
- +Supports 6 asset classes including Forex, Crypto, Metals, Indices, Commodities, and Equities.
- +On-demand payouts, weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted.
FundedElite CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
- −Max funding of $300,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
- −Overall drawdown of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, offering marginally less buffer.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy