RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Leeloo Trading vs Monevis Funding

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

Leeloo Trading
LELO
Leeloo Trading
EST. 2021
MNVF
Monevis Funding
EST. 2024
LEELOO TRADING
METRIC
MONEVIS FUNDING
78/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
90%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$150,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$110
MIN COST
—
14d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

LEELOO TRADING DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic
TYPES
futures

MONEVIS FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS
-phase
DRAWDOWN
Static

Leeloo Trading PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%
  • +Single-step evaluation is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps
  • +Min challenge cost of $110 is below the industry average of $186.7
  • +News trading and EA/automated trading are both permitted, offering broad strategy flexibility

Leeloo Trading CONS

  • −Max funding of $150,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.70
  • −Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days
  • −Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting trading flexibility compared to firms that permit it

Monevis Funding PROS

  • +Static drawdown type provides a fixed, predictable risk boundary, which some traders prefer for planning.
  • +Czech Republic is an EU-member jurisdiction, which may offer relevant regulatory context.
  • +No platform or market data is available to assess further strengths.
  • +No funding or cost data is provided to compare against industry benchmarks.

Monevis Funding CONS

  • −Founded in 2024, making Monevis Funding a very new firm with limited operational track record.
  • −No profit split, max funding, or challenge cost data is available for comparison against industry averages.
  • −Lack of transparency around key metrics is a concern for traders making informed decisions.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Leeloo Trading
Higher trust score (78/100). Faster payouts at 14d. 90% profit split.
Monevis Funding
Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

Leeloo Trading Full Review →Monevis Funding Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy