RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Leeloo Trading vs Aqua Funded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

Leeloo Trading
LELO
Leeloo Trading
EST. 2021
Aqua Funded
AQUA
Aqua Funded
EST. 2023
LEELOO TRADING
METRIC
AQUA FUNDED
78/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
54/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
90%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE90%
$150,000
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$2,000,000
$110
MIN COST
BETTER$1
14d
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER7d
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

LEELOO TRADING DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic
TYPES
futures

AQUA FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker

Leeloo Trading PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%
  • +Single-step evaluation is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps
  • +Min challenge cost of $110 is below the industry average of $186.7
  • +News trading and EA/automated trading are both permitted, offering broad strategy flexibility

Leeloo Trading CONS

  • Max funding of $150,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.70
  • Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days
  • Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting trading flexibility compared to firms that permit it

Aqua Funded PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of just $1 is exceptionally below the industry average of $186.7, making it highly accessible.
  • +Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • +Profit split of 90% significantly exceeds the industry average of 84.7%.
  • +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering maximum trading flexibility.

Aqua Funded CONS

  • Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to manage larger potential losses.
  • Profit target of 10% is higher than the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to pass.
  • Days to first payout of 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5 days.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Leeloo Trading
Higher trust score (78/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 90% profit split.
Aqua Funded
Lower trust score (54/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Leeloo Trading Full Review →Aqua Funded Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy