RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Lucid Trading vs The Trading Pit Futures

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

LCDT
Lucid Trading
TTPF
The Trading Pit Futures
LUCID TRADING
METRIC
THE TRADING PIT FUTURES
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
90%
PROFIT SPLIT
MAX FUNDING
$90
MIN COST
1d
PAYOUT DAYS
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

LUCID TRADING DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic, MotiveWave, QuantTower

THE TRADING PIT FUTURES DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

Lucid Trading PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% is above the industry average of 84.7%
  • +Days to first payout of 1 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +On-demand payouts offer maximum flexibility in accessing earned profits
  • +Wide platform selection including NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic, MotiveWave, and QuantTower

Lucid Trading CONS

  • No max funding data provided, preventing comparison to the industry average of $839,272.70
  • Profit target of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, marginally harder to achieve
  • Trailing EOD drawdown type can be more restrictive than fixed drawdown structures

The Trading Pit Futures PROS

  • +Based in Liechtenstein, which has a well-regulated financial environment offering potential trader protections.
  • +No further data is available to substantiate additional pros at this time.
  • +No platform or market data is provided to assess trading conditions.
  • +No funding or cost data is available to compare against industry benchmarks.

The Trading Pit Futures CONS

  • Almost no operational data is available for The Trading Pit Futures, making comparison impossible.
  • Absence of drawdown, profit split, and funding figures prevents any meaningful evaluation.
  • Note: as a futures firm, drawdown may be expressed in dollar terms and cannot be compared to the 7.9% CFD average.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Lucid Trading
Higher trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 90% profit split.
The Trading Pit Futures
Higher trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

Lucid Trading Full Review →The Trading Pit Futures Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy