RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Lucid Trading vs Topstep

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

LCDT
Lucid Trading
Topstep
TOPS
Topstep
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2012
LUCID TRADING
METRIC
TOPSTEP
63/100
TRUST SCORE
BETTER69/100
4.67/5BETTER
RATING
3/5
90%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE90%
MAX FUNDING
$150,000
$90
MIN COST
BETTER$49
1dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
7d
PASS RATE
28%
2
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER3

LUCID TRADING DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic, MotiveWave, QuantTower

TOPSTEP DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
futures, beginner

Lucid Trading PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% is above the industry average of 84.7%
  • +Days to first payout of 1 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +On-demand payouts offer maximum flexibility in accessing earned profits
  • +Wide platform selection including NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic, MotiveWave, and QuantTower

Lucid Trading CONS

  • No max funding data provided, preventing comparison to the industry average of $839,272.70
  • Profit target of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, marginally harder to achieve
  • Trailing EOD drawdown type can be more restrictive than fixed drawdown structures

Topstep PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%, offering traders a superior earnings share.
  • +Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly accessible.
  • +Single-step funding is better than the industry average of 1.6 steps, streamlining the path to funded status.
  • +Founded in 2012, Topstep is one of the most established prop firms, providing strong credibility and track record.

Topstep CONS

  • Max funding of $150,000 is far below the industry average of $839,272.7, significantly limiting earning potential.
  • Overall drawdown of 10% with trailing EOD type means drawdown limits tighten as profits grow, increasing risk.
  • Days to first payout at 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5, a minor but notable delay.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Lucid Trading
Lower trust score (63/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 90% profit split.
Topstep
Higher trust score (69/100). Slower payouts at 7d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Lucid Trading Full Review →Topstep Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy