RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Lucid Trading vs RebelsFunding

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

LCDT
Lucid Trading
RBLS
RebelsFunding
EST. 2023
LUCID TRADING
METRIC
REBELSFUNDING
63/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
42/100
4.67/5BETTER
RATING
3/5
90%BETTER
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
MAX FUNDING
$320,000
$90
MIN COST
BETTER$9
1d
PAYOUT DAYS
PASS RATE
2BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
1

LUCID TRADING DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic, MotiveWave, QuantTower

REBELSFUNDING DETAILS

STEPS
4-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex

Lucid Trading PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% is above the industry average of 84.7%
  • +Days to first payout of 1 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +On-demand payouts offer maximum flexibility in accessing earned profits
  • +Wide platform selection including NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic, MotiveWave, and QuantTower

Lucid Trading CONS

  • No max funding data provided, preventing comparison to the industry average of $839,272.70
  • Profit target of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, marginally harder to achieve
  • Trailing EOD drawdown type can be more restrictive than fixed drawdown structures

RebelsFunding PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $9 is extraordinarily low compared to the industry average of $186.7, minimising entry risk.
  • +Profit target of 5% is well below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to complete.
  • +Fee refund is available, giving traders the opportunity to recover the challenge cost.
  • +Fixed drawdown type provides clearly defined and stable risk parameters for traders.

RebelsFunding CONS

  • Steps to funded is 4, far above the industry average of 1.6, requiring significantly more evaluation stages.
  • Max funding of $320,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting potential earnings.
  • Markets are limited to forex only, offering no diversification into indices, metals, commodities, or crypto.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Lucid Trading
Higher trust score (63/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 90% profit split.
RebelsFunding
Lower trust score (42/100). Slower payouts at —d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Lucid Trading Full Review →RebelsFunding Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy