RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Lucid Trading vs OFP Funding

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

LCDT
Lucid Trading
OFPF
OFP Funding
EST. 2021
LUCID TRADING
METRIC
OFP FUNDING
63/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
60/100
4.67/5
RATING
BETTER5/5
90%BETTER
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
MAX FUNDING
$200,000
$90BETTER
MIN COST
$150
1dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
2d
PASS RATE
2BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
1

LUCID TRADING DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic, MotiveWave, QuantTower

OFP FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities
PLATFORMS
MT5, TradingView

Lucid Trading PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% is above the industry average of 84.7%
  • +Days to first payout of 1 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +On-demand payouts offer maximum flexibility in accessing earned profits
  • +Wide platform selection including NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic, MotiveWave, and QuantTower

Lucid Trading CONS

  • No max funding data provided, preventing comparison to the industry average of $839,272.70
  • Profit target of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, marginally harder to achieve
  • Trailing EOD drawdown type can be more restrictive than fixed drawdown structures

OFP Funding PROS

  • +Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded.
  • +Days to first payout of 2 days is well below the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Profit target of 5% is well below the industry average of 7.9%, making it easier to pass.
  • +News trading and weekend holding are both permitted.

OFP Funding CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
  • Min challenge cost of $150 is above the industry average of $186.7 — close to average but notable.
  • Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Lucid Trading
Higher trust score (63/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 90% profit split.
OFP Funding
Lower trust score (60/100). Slower payouts at 2d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Lucid Trading Full Review →OFP Funding Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy