RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Lucid Trading vs Genk Capital

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

LCDT
Lucid Trading
GENK
Genk Capital
EST. 2010
LUCID TRADING
METRIC
GENK CAPITAL
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
90%
PROFIT SPLIT
MAX FUNDING
$90
MIN COST
1d
PAYOUT DAYS
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

LUCID TRADING DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic, MotiveWave, QuantTower

GENK CAPITAL DETAILS

STEPS
-phase
MARKETS
Equities, Commodities, Digital Assets

Lucid Trading PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% is above the industry average of 84.7%
  • +Days to first payout of 1 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +On-demand payouts offer maximum flexibility in accessing earned profits
  • +Wide platform selection including NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic, MotiveWave, and QuantTower

Lucid Trading CONS

  • No max funding data provided, preventing comparison to the industry average of $839,272.70
  • Profit target of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, marginally harder to achieve
  • Trailing EOD drawdown type can be more restrictive than fixed drawdown structures

Genk Capital PROS

  • +Founded in 2010, giving Genk Capital over 14 years of operational history and implied institutional experience.
  • +Singapore-based firm operating in one of Asia's most reputable and well-regulated financial hubs.
  • +Covers Equities, Commodities, and Digital Assets, offering access to diverse and distinct asset classes.
  • +Long-established presence may suggest greater financial stability than newer prop firms.

Genk Capital CONS

  • No profit split, max funding, drawdown, or challenge cost data is available for industry comparison.
  • Absence of platform information makes it impossible to assess the trading environment.
  • Traders cannot evaluate value or risk parameters without core metrics such as drawdown or profit targets.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Lucid Trading
Higher trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 90% profit split.
Genk Capital
Higher trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

Lucid Trading Full Review →Genk Capital Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy