RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Lucid Trading vs FundedFast

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

LCDT
Lucid Trading
FNDF
FundedFast
LUCID TRADING
METRIC
FUNDEDFAST
63/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
56/100
4.67/5BETTER
RATING
2.57/5
90%BETTER
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
MAX FUNDING
$400,000
$90
MIN COST
BETTER$49
1dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
7d
PASS RATE
2TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE2

LUCID TRADING DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic, MotiveWave, QuantTower

FUNDEDFAST DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex

Lucid Trading PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% is above the industry average of 84.7%
  • +Days to first payout of 1 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +On-demand payouts offer maximum flexibility in accessing earned profits
  • +Wide platform selection including NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic, MotiveWave, and QuantTower

Lucid Trading CONS

  • No max funding data provided, preventing comparison to the industry average of $839,272.70
  • Profit target of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, marginally harder to achieve
  • Trailing EOD drawdown type can be more restrictive than fixed drawdown structures

FundedFast PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $49 is extremely low compared to the industry average of $186.7
  • +Fee refund offered, reducing the net cost of the evaluation process
  • +Weekend holding is allowed, providing greater trading flexibility
  • +Weekly payout frequency offers faster access to profits than many firms

FundedFast CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
  • Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating less buffer
  • Profit target of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, marginally harder to achieve

PROPDNA VERDICT

Lucid Trading
Higher trust score (63/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 90% profit split.
FundedFast
Lower trust score (56/100). Slower payouts at 7d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Lucid Trading Full Review →FundedFast Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy