RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Lucid Trading vs Blue Guardian Futures

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

LCDT
Lucid Trading
BGFT
Blue Guardian Futures
LUCID TRADING
METRIC
BLUE GUARDIAN FUTURES
63/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
61/100
4.67/5BETTER
RATING
4.29/5
90%
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER100%
MAX FUNDING
$450,000
$90
MIN COST
BETTER$84
1dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
5d
PASS RATE
2
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER3

LUCID TRADING DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic, MotiveWave, QuantTower

BLUE GUARDIAN FUTURES DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
MT5, Matchtrader, Tradelocker, Tradovate, ProjectX, Volsys, Deepcharts

Lucid Trading PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% is above the industry average of 84.7%
  • +Days to first payout of 1 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +On-demand payouts offer maximum flexibility in accessing earned profits
  • +Wide platform selection including NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic, MotiveWave, and QuantTower

Lucid Trading CONS

  • No max funding data provided, preventing comparison to the industry average of $839,272.70
  • Profit target of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, marginally harder to achieve
  • Trailing EOD drawdown type can be more restrictive than fixed drawdown structures

Blue Guardian Futures PROS

  • +Profit split of 100% is the maximum possible, far exceeding the industry average of 84.7%
  • +Min challenge cost of $84 is well below the industry average of $186.70, reducing entry costs
  • +Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, offering a streamlined path to capital
  • +Days to first payout is 5, slightly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days

Blue Guardian Futures CONS

  • Overall drawdown of 3.5% is expressed as a percentage but is exceptionally tight, increasing disqualification risk
  • Max funding of $450,000 is below the industry average of $839,272, limiting maximum earning potential
  • Futures-only market access restricts traders who prefer Forex, Indices, or other asset classes

PROPDNA VERDICT

Lucid Trading
Higher trust score (63/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 90% profit split.
Blue Guardian Futures
Lower trust score (61/100). Slower payouts at 5d. 100% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Lucid Trading Full Review →Blue Guardian Futures Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy