RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Lucid Trading vs Blue Guardian Futures
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
LCDT
Lucid Trading
BGFT
Blue Guardian Futures
LUCID TRADING
METRIC
BLUE GUARDIAN FUTURES
63/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—61/100
4.67/5BETTER
RATING
—4.29/5
90%—
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER100%
—
MAX FUNDING
$450,000
$90—
MIN COST
BETTER$84
1dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
—5d
—
PASS RATE
—
2—
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER3
LUCID TRADING DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing EOD
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic, MotiveWave, QuantTower
BLUE GUARDIAN FUTURES DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing EOD
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, Matchtrader, Tradelocker, Tradovate, ProjectX, Volsys, Deepcharts
Lucid Trading PROS
- +Profit split of 90% is above the industry average of 84.7%
- +Days to first payout of 1 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
- +On-demand payouts offer maximum flexibility in accessing earned profits
- +Wide platform selection including NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic, MotiveWave, and QuantTower
Lucid Trading CONS
- −No max funding data provided, preventing comparison to the industry average of $839,272.70
- −Profit target of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, marginally harder to achieve
- −Trailing EOD drawdown type can be more restrictive than fixed drawdown structures
Blue Guardian Futures PROS
- +Profit split of 100% is the maximum possible, far exceeding the industry average of 84.7%
- +Min challenge cost of $84 is well below the industry average of $186.70, reducing entry costs
- +Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, offering a streamlined path to capital
- +Days to first payout is 5, slightly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
Blue Guardian Futures CONS
- −Overall drawdown of 3.5% is expressed as a percentage but is exceptionally tight, increasing disqualification risk
- −Max funding of $450,000 is below the industry average of $839,272, limiting maximum earning potential
- −Futures-only market access restricts traders who prefer Forex, Indices, or other asset classes
PROPDNA VERDICT
Blue Guardian Futures
Lower trust score (61/100). Slower payouts at 5d. 100% profit split.
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy