RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Kershner Trading Group vs Tradeify

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

KRTG

Kershner Trading Group

EST. 2001

TRFY

Tradeify

EST. 2022

KERSHNER TRADING GROUP

METRIC

TRADEIFY

44/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER61/100

5/5BETTER

RATING

—3.75/5

—

PROFIT SPLIT

90%

—

MAX FUNDING

$150,000

—

MIN COST

$99

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

1—

REVIEW COUNT

BETTER3

KERSHNER TRADING GROUP DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

TRADEIFY DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: NinjaTrader, Quantower, Rithmic, TradingView, Tradovate, WealthCharts
TYPES: futures, fast-payout

Kershner Trading Group PROS

+Founded in 2001, making Kershner Trading Group one of the longer-established firms with over 23 years of history.
+US-based firm operating in a well-known and scrutinised financial jurisdiction.
+Decades of operation may indicate robust risk management and institutional-level infrastructure.
+Long track record provides a level of credibility that newer prop firms cannot demonstrate.

Kershner Trading Group CONS

−No profit split, max funding, drawdown, or challenge cost data is provided for comparison.
−Absence of platform and market data makes it impossible to assess trading conditions or flexibility.
−Traders cannot benchmark Kershner against industry averages without core financial and operational metrics.

Tradeify PROS

+Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, offering traders a larger earnings share
+Min challenge cost of $99 is well below the industry average of $186.7, lowering entry barriers
+Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps, offering faster access to capital
+On-demand payouts provide maximum flexibility compared to fixed payout schedule firms

Tradeify CONS

−Max funding of $150,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7
−Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, leaving less room for drawdown
−Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting trading flexibility for position traders

PROPDNA VERDICT

Kershner Trading Group

Lower trust score (44/100). Slower payouts at —d.

START WITH KRTG