RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Kershner Trading Group vs QT Funded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

KRTG

Kershner Trading Group

EST. 2001

QT Funded

EST. 2023

KERSHNER TRADING GROUP

METRIC

QT FUNDED

44/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER64/100

5/5TIE

RATING

TIE5/5

—

PROFIT SPLIT

80%

—

MAX FUNDING

$400,000

—

MIN COST

$12

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

1—

REVIEW COUNT

BETTER2

KERSHNER TRADING GROUP DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

QT FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Metals, Indices, Commodities, Crypto
PLATFORMS: MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker

Kershner Trading Group PROS

+Founded in 2001, making Kershner Trading Group one of the longer-established firms with over 23 years of history.
+US-based firm operating in a well-known and scrutinised financial jurisdiction.
+Decades of operation may indicate robust risk management and institutional-level infrastructure.
+Long track record provides a level of credibility that newer prop firms cannot demonstrate.

Kershner Trading Group CONS

−No profit split, max funding, drawdown, or challenge cost data is provided for comparison.
−Absence of platform and market data makes it impossible to assess trading conditions or flexibility.
−Traders cannot benchmark Kershner against industry averages without core financial and operational metrics.

QT Funded PROS

+Minimum challenge cost of $12 is drastically below the industry average of $186.7.
+Days to first payout of 1 day is far faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the challenge.
+Profit target of 7% is below the industry average of 8%, making the target easier to hit.

QT Funded CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
−Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating higher risk tolerance required.
−News trading is not allowed, restricting a commonly used trading strategy.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Kershner Trading Group

Lower trust score (44/100). Slower payouts at —d.

START WITH KRTG