RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Kershner Trading Group vs PipFarm

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

KRTG
Kershner Trading Group
EST. 2001
PipFarm
PFAR
PipFarm
EST. 2023
KERSHNER TRADING GROUP
METRIC
PIPFARM
44/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER56/100
5/5BETTER
RATING
—4/5
—
PROFIT SPLIT
85%
—
MAX FUNDING
$200,000
—
MIN COST
$45
—
PAYOUT DAYS
7d
—
PASS RATE
—
1TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE1

KERSHNER TRADING GROUP DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

PIPFARM DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
forex, fast-payout

Kershner Trading Group PROS

  • +Founded in 2001, making Kershner Trading Group one of the longer-established firms with over 23 years of history.
  • +US-based firm operating in a well-known and scrutinised financial jurisdiction.
  • +Decades of operation may indicate robust risk management and institutional-level infrastructure.
  • +Long track record provides a level of credibility that newer prop firms cannot demonstrate.

Kershner Trading Group CONS

  • −No profit split, max funding, drawdown, or challenge cost data is provided for comparison.
  • −Absence of platform and market data makes it impossible to assess trading conditions or flexibility.
  • −Traders cannot benchmark Kershner against industry averages without core financial and operational metrics.

PipFarm PROS

  • +Minimum challenge cost of $45 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
  • +Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded.
  • +Profit split of 85% slightly exceeds the industry average of 84.7%.
  • +News trading, EA/automated trading, and weekend holding are all permitted.

PipFarm CONS

  • −Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • −Days to first payout at 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5.
  • −Founded in 2023, offering a limited operational track record for traders to assess.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Kershner Trading Group
Lower trust score (44/100). Slower payouts at —d.
PipFarm
Higher trust score (56/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 85% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Kershner Trading Group Full Review →PipFarm Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy