RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Kershner Trading Group vs Get Funded Now
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
KRTG
Kershner Trading Group
EST. 2001
GFND
Get Funded Now
KERSHNER TRADING GROUP
METRIC
GET FUNDED NOW
44/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER57/100
5/5BETTER
RATING
—2/5
—
PROFIT SPLIT
90%
—
MAX FUNDING
$200,000
—
MIN COST
$123
—
PAYOUT DAYS
1d
—
PASS RATE
—
1TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE1
KERSHNER TRADING GROUP DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
GET FUNDED NOW DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities
Kershner Trading Group PROS
- +Founded in 2001, making Kershner Trading Group one of the longer-established firms with over 23 years of history.
- +US-based firm operating in a well-known and scrutinised financial jurisdiction.
- +Decades of operation may indicate robust risk management and institutional-level infrastructure.
- +Long track record provides a level of credibility that newer prop firms cannot demonstrate.
Kershner Trading Group CONS
- −No profit split, max funding, drawdown, or challenge cost data is provided for comparison.
- −Absence of platform and market data makes it impossible to assess trading conditions or flexibility.
- −Traders cannot benchmark Kershner against industry averages without core financial and operational metrics.
Get Funded Now PROS
- +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%
- +Days to first payout of 1 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
- +Single-step evaluation is below the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded
- +On-demand payouts provide maximum flexibility in accessing earned profits
Get Funded Now CONS
- −Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, offering less buffer
- −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation harder to pass
- −Max funding of $200,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.70
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy