RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Kershner Trading Group vs Funding Traders
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
KRTG
Kershner Trading Group
EST. 2001
FNDG
Funding Traders
KERSHNER TRADING GROUP
METRIC
FUNDING TRADERS
0/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER60/100
0/5—
RATING
BETTER3.5/5
—
PROFIT SPLIT
90%
—
MAX FUNDING
$400,000
—
MIN COST
$25
—
PAYOUT DAYS
14d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
KERSHNER TRADING GROUP DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
FUNDING TRADERS DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto, Stocks
Kershner Trading Group PROS
- +Founded in 2001, making Kershner Trading Group one of the longer-established firms with over 23 years of history.
- +US-based firm operating in a well-known and scrutinised financial jurisdiction.
- +Decades of operation may indicate robust risk management and institutional-level infrastructure.
- +Long track record provides a level of credibility that newer prop firms cannot demonstrate.
Kershner Trading Group CONS
- −No profit split, max funding, drawdown, or challenge cost data is provided for comparison.
- −Absence of platform and market data makes it impossible to assess trading conditions or flexibility.
- −Traders cannot benchmark Kershner against industry averages without core financial and operational metrics.
Funding Traders PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $25 is far below the industry average of $186.7, making evaluation highly affordable.
- +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, with a fee refund also available to traders.
- +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the evaluation threshold easier to achieve.
- +Covers five asset classes including Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto, and Stocks, offering strong diversification.
Funding Traders CONS
- −Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, providing a tighter risk boundary for traders.
- −Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, delaying profit access.
- −Max funding of $400,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting maximum earning potential.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy