RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Kershner Trading Group vs FundedFast
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
KRTG
Kershner Trading Group
EST. 2001
FNDF
FundedFast
KERSHNER TRADING GROUP
METRIC
FUNDEDFAST
44/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER56/100
5/5BETTER
RATING
—2.57/5
—
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
—
MAX FUNDING
$400,000
—
MIN COST
$49
—
PAYOUT DAYS
7d
—
PASS RATE
—
1—
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER2
KERSHNER TRADING GROUP DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
FUNDEDFAST DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex
Kershner Trading Group PROS
- +Founded in 2001, making Kershner Trading Group one of the longer-established firms with over 23 years of history.
- +US-based firm operating in a well-known and scrutinised financial jurisdiction.
- +Decades of operation may indicate robust risk management and institutional-level infrastructure.
- +Long track record provides a level of credibility that newer prop firms cannot demonstrate.
Kershner Trading Group CONS
- −No profit split, max funding, drawdown, or challenge cost data is provided for comparison.
- −Absence of platform and market data makes it impossible to assess trading conditions or flexibility.
- −Traders cannot benchmark Kershner against industry averages without core financial and operational metrics.
FundedFast PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $49 is extremely low compared to the industry average of $186.7
- +Fee refund offered, reducing the net cost of the evaluation process
- +Weekend holding is allowed, providing greater trading flexibility
- +Weekly payout frequency offers faster access to profits than many firms
FundedFast CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
- −Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating less buffer
- −Profit target of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, marginally harder to achieve
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy