RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Kershner Trading Group vs Funderpro

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

KRTG
Kershner Trading Group
EST. 2001
Funderpro
FDRP
Funderpro
EST. 2023
KERSHNER TRADING GROUP
METRIC
FUNDERPRO
44/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER65/100
5/5BETTER
RATING
—4.78/5
—
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
—
MAX FUNDING
$200,000
—
MIN COST
$79
—
PAYOUT DAYS
1d
—
PASS RATE
—
1—
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER3

KERSHNER TRADING GROUP DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

FUNDERPRO DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, Match-Trader

Kershner Trading Group PROS

  • +Founded in 2001, making Kershner Trading Group one of the longer-established firms with over 23 years of history.
  • +US-based firm operating in a well-known and scrutinised financial jurisdiction.
  • +Decades of operation may indicate robust risk management and institutional-level infrastructure.
  • +Long track record provides a level of credibility that newer prop firms cannot demonstrate.

Kershner Trading Group CONS

  • −No profit split, max funding, drawdown, or challenge cost data is provided for comparison.
  • −Absence of platform and market data makes it impossible to assess trading conditions or flexibility.
  • −Traders cannot benchmark Kershner against industry averages without core financial and operational metrics.

Funderpro PROS

  • +Days to first payout of 1 is far below the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +Min challenge cost of $79 is well below the industry average of $186.7
  • +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
  • +Four platforms supported (MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, Match-Trader) offering broad trader choice

Funderpro CONS

  • −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
  • −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring more gain to pass evaluation
  • −Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting flexibility for swing traders

PROPDNA VERDICT

Kershner Trading Group
Lower trust score (44/100). Slower payouts at —d.
Funderpro
Higher trust score (65/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Kershner Trading Group Full Review →Funderpro Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy