RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Kershner Trading Group vs DPFunded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

KRTG

Kershner Trading Group

EST. 2001

DPFD

DPFunded

KERSHNER TRADING GROUP

METRIC

DPFUNDED

44/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—40/100

5/5BETTER

RATING

—0/5

—

PROFIT SPLIT

80%

—

MAX FUNDING

$400,000

—

MIN COST

$58

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

1BETTER

REVIEW COUNT

—0

KERSHNER TRADING GROUP DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

DPFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Commodities, Indices

Kershner Trading Group PROS

+Founded in 2001, making Kershner Trading Group one of the longer-established firms with over 23 years of history.
+US-based firm operating in a well-known and scrutinised financial jurisdiction.
+Decades of operation may indicate robust risk management and institutional-level infrastructure.
+Long track record provides a level of credibility that newer prop firms cannot demonstrate.

Kershner Trading Group CONS

−No profit split, max funding, drawdown, or challenge cost data is provided for comparison.
−Absence of platform and market data makes it impossible to assess trading conditions or flexibility.
−Traders cannot benchmark Kershner against industry averages without core financial and operational metrics.

DPFunded PROS

+Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, offering a faster route to capital.
+Min challenge cost of $58 is significantly below the industry average of $186.7, reducing upfront cost.
+Fixed drawdown type provides traders with clear and predictable risk boundaries.
+EA/automated trading is permitted, accommodating algorithmic and systematic trading strategies.

DPFunded CONS

−Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, giving traders less room to absorb losses.
−Max funding of $400,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
−News trading is not allowed and payout frequency is monthly, restricting strategy flexibility and delaying income.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Kershner Trading Group

Higher trust score (44/100). Faster payouts at —d.

START WITH KRTG