RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Kershner Trading Group vs 3Red Partners

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

KRTG

Kershner Trading Group

EST. 2001

3RED

3Red Partners

KERSHNER TRADING GROUP

METRIC

3RED PARTNERS

0/100TIE

TRUST SCORE

TIE0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

—

PROFIT SPLIT

—

MAX FUNDING

—

MIN COST

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

KERSHNER TRADING GROUP DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

3RED PARTNERS DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

Kershner Trading Group PROS

+Founded in 2001, making Kershner Trading Group one of the longer-established firms with over 23 years of history.
+US-based firm operating in a well-known and scrutinised financial jurisdiction.
+Decades of operation may indicate robust risk management and institutional-level infrastructure.
+Long track record provides a level of credibility that newer prop firms cannot demonstrate.

Kershner Trading Group CONS

−No profit split, max funding, drawdown, or challenge cost data is provided for comparison.
−Absence of platform and market data makes it impossible to assess trading conditions or flexibility.
−Traders cannot benchmark Kershner against industry averages without core financial and operational metrics.

3Red Partners PROS

+US-based firm operating in a well-known and scrutinised financial jurisdiction.
+No further data is available to substantiate additional pros at this time.
+No platform or market data is provided to assess trading conditions.
+No funding or cost data is available to compare against industry benchmarks.

3Red Partners CONS

−Almost no operational data is available for 3Red Partners, making meaningful comparison impossible.
−No profit split, drawdown, funding levels, or challenge cost are disclosed for benchmark comparison.
−Traders cannot assess trading conditions or earning potential without core metrics being provided.

PROPDNA VERDICT