RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Infinity Forex Funds vs Savius
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
IFXF
Infinity Forex Funds
SVUS
Savius
EST. 2013
INFINITY FOREX FUNDS
METRIC
SAVIUS
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
—
PROFIT SPLIT
90%
—
MAX FUNDING
$300,000
—
MIN COST
$285
—
PAYOUT DAYS
3d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
INFINITY FOREX FUNDS DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
- MARKETS
- Forex
SAVIUS DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Futures, Indices
- PLATFORMS
- ATAS, Quantower
Infinity Forex Funds PROS
- +UK-based regulation environment may offer traders a degree of additional oversight and credibility.
- +Forex-focused offering targets the largest and most liquid financial market globally.
- +Specialisation in forex may indicate a refined and expert evaluation process for currency traders.
- +A focused market offering can simplify the trading environment for forex-specialist traders.
Infinity Forex Funds CONS
- −No trading data has been provided for this firm, making objective comparison impossible.
- −Without profit split, drawdown, funding levels, or challenge cost, no industry benchmarks can be applied.
- −Markets are limited to forex only, offering no exposure to indices, metals, commodities, or crypto.
Savius PROS
- +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7% by 5.3 percentage points
- +Days to first payout is 3, significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
- +Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, simplifying the path to capital
- +Founded in 2013, making it one of the more established prop firms with over a decade of operation
Savius CONS
- −Max funding of $300,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272, limiting earning potential
- −Min challenge cost of $285 is significantly higher than the industry average of $186.70
- −Overall drawdown of 4% is considerably tighter than the industry average of 7.9%, increasing risk of disqualification
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy