RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Infinity Forex Funds vs Matrix Executions

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

IFXF

Infinity Forex Funds

MTRX

Matrix Executions

EST. 2018

INFINITY FOREX FUNDS

METRIC

MATRIX EXECUTIONS

0/100TIE

TRUST SCORE

TIE0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

—

PROFIT SPLIT

—

MAX FUNDING

—

MIN COST

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

INFINITY FOREX FUNDS DETAILS

STEPS: -phase
MARKETS: Forex

MATRIX EXECUTIONS DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

Infinity Forex Funds PROS

+UK-based regulation environment may offer traders a degree of additional oversight and credibility.
+Forex-focused offering targets the largest and most liquid financial market globally.
+Specialisation in forex may indicate a refined and expert evaluation process for currency traders.
+A focused market offering can simplify the trading environment for forex-specialist traders.

Infinity Forex Funds CONS

−No trading data has been provided for this firm, making objective comparison impossible.
−Without profit split, drawdown, funding levels, or challenge cost, no industry benchmarks can be applied.
−Markets are limited to forex only, offering no exposure to indices, metals, commodities, or crypto.

Matrix Executions PROS

+Founded in 2018, Matrix Executions has a longer operating history than most prop firms, suggesting stability.
+No additional data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Matrix Executions.
+No additional data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Matrix Executions.
+No additional data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Matrix Executions.

Matrix Executions CONS

−Almost no firm data is provided beyond founding year, making meaningful comparison to industry averages impossible.
−Without profit split, funding, or challenge cost data, traders cannot evaluate value against industry benchmarks.
−Lack of transparency on payout, drawdown, and trading rules limits trader decision-making confidence significantly.

PROPDNA VERDICT