RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Infinity Forex Funds vs Lucid Trading
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
IFXF
Infinity Forex Funds
LCDT
Lucid Trading
INFINITY FOREX FUNDS
METRIC
LUCID TRADING
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
—
PROFIT SPLIT
90%
—
MAX FUNDING
—
—
MIN COST
$90
—
PAYOUT DAYS
1d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
INFINITY FOREX FUNDS DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
- MARKETS
- Forex
LUCID TRADING DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing EOD
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic, MotiveWave, QuantTower
Infinity Forex Funds PROS
- +UK-based regulation environment may offer traders a degree of additional oversight and credibility.
- +Forex-focused offering targets the largest and most liquid financial market globally.
- +Specialisation in forex may indicate a refined and expert evaluation process for currency traders.
- +A focused market offering can simplify the trading environment for forex-specialist traders.
Infinity Forex Funds CONS
- −No trading data has been provided for this firm, making objective comparison impossible.
- −Without profit split, drawdown, funding levels, or challenge cost, no industry benchmarks can be applied.
- −Markets are limited to forex only, offering no exposure to indices, metals, commodities, or crypto.
Lucid Trading PROS
- +Profit split of 90% is above the industry average of 84.7%
- +Days to first payout of 1 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
- +On-demand payouts offer maximum flexibility in accessing earned profits
- +Wide platform selection including NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic, MotiveWave, and QuantTower
Lucid Trading CONS
- −No max funding data provided, preventing comparison to the industry average of $839,272.70
- −Profit target of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, marginally harder to achieve
- −Trailing EOD drawdown type can be more restrictive than fixed drawdown structures
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy