RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Infinity Forex Funds vs FuturesElite
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
IFXF
Infinity Forex Funds
FTEL
FuturesElite
INFINITY FOREX FUNDS
METRIC
FUTURESELITE
43/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER59/100
4/5TIE
RATING
TIE4/5
—
PROFIT SPLIT
100%
—
MAX FUNDING
$150,000
—
MIN COST
$79
—
PAYOUT DAYS
1d
—
PASS RATE
—
1TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE1
INFINITY FOREX FUNDS DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
- MARKETS
- Forex
FUTURESELITE DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- Tradovate, NinjaTrader, Quantower, Atas
Infinity Forex Funds PROS
- +UK-based regulation environment may offer traders a degree of additional oversight and credibility.
- +Forex-focused offering targets the largest and most liquid financial market globally.
- +Specialisation in forex may indicate a refined and expert evaluation process for currency traders.
- +A focused market offering can simplify the trading environment for forex-specialist traders.
Infinity Forex Funds CONS
- −No trading data has been provided for this firm, making objective comparison impossible.
- −Without profit split, drawdown, funding levels, or challenge cost, no industry benchmarks can be applied.
- −Markets are limited to forex only, offering no exposure to indices, metals, commodities, or crypto.
FuturesElite PROS
- +Profit split of 100% is exceptional and far above the industry average of 84.7%, maximising trader earnings.
- +Days to first payout of 1 is far faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
- +Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, enabling faster access to capital.
- +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to achieve.
FuturesElite CONS
- −Max funding of $150,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
- −Overall drawdown is dollar-denominated at $2,000 and cannot be meaningfully compared to the percentage-based industry average.
- −No daily drawdown limit is listed, which may introduce uncertainty around intraday risk controls.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy